Thursday, 8 March 2012

WEEK EIGHT - TO MARKET TO MARKET TO BUY A WEB 2.0

This weeks lecture was delivered by Alexis Barlow and was on marketing - concept and orientation. How Web 2.0 is transforming marketing techniques. We looked at the 5P's of marketing, all of which were covered in college (however I appreciate that not everyone in the lecture has this background) Product, Price, Place, People and Promotion. Business Dictionary defined Marketing as 'The management process through which goods and services move from concept to the customer.' As a philosophy marketing is based on the business in terms of what the customers want and delivering their needs. Web 2.0 Marketing doesn't appear to be much different and the principles are pretty much the same as we looked at leveraging Marketing and the elements of the Promotional Ps and the use of e-technologies. E-marketing is defined slightly differently to Marketing as it uses electronic communication technology to achieve marketing objectives.  I found an interesting article on Google Scholar - Web 2.0 Storytelling Emergence of a New Genre.  This article suggests the pattern is changing and that social media marketing is open-ended, branching, hyper-linked, cross media, participatory, exploratory and unpredictable. So how can we control Marketing on-line? Simple answer we can't but we can perhaps guide it in a particular direction.

From this we were able to discuss ways in which we thought that the Internet has impacted on the 5 Ps:

Product - Introduces a digital version such as the iPad, Kindle or Tablet. Improves the product for example, the anticipated iPad 3 with voice dictation!
Price - Has become more competitive perhaps due to less overheads so companies able to lower prices. Differential pricing. Price can also be adjusted to meet the market, example given was BA flight prices in comparison to Sleazyjet.... eh Easyjet. You get what you pay for!
Place - Geographically can be reached globally and provides opportunities for new channel structures. Also virtual space is all that is required, for example eBay who rely on items being sold by customers and they do not need to offer catalogue, shop or warehouse space.
People - how you personalise with the use of customer service and advertising the image of your company.
Promotion - Emphasis being on promotion and how you tell people about your company. This was discussed further in the lecture.

Actually found this lecture really interesting even though I had covered marketing before - e-marketing is on a whole new level and I enjoy seeing things from another viewpoint and perhaps thinking about things I wouldn't have before.

We then went on to look at Integrated Marketing Communications where an organisation would use a mix of agents and traditional & internet promotion mix and how this is affected by Social Media. MMC Learning suggest that Integrated Marketing Communications is just a method of ensuring all forms of communiaction and messages are carefully linked together by integrating all promotional tools to ensure they work together. There are a number of definitions for Web 2.0 Marketing which we looked at but linking back to last week and the documentary we watched 'Mark Zuckerberg - Inside Facebook' we were able to see how social media had progressed to take members of virtual communities and how individuals link globally, to the extent that in November 2011 The Telegraph reported Facebook have suggested that the average number of connections between people has dropped from 6 down to 4!! Isn't that a bit crazy? Web 2.0 therefore creates a new and dynamic way to communicate and companies can effectively jump on the band wagon and use social media to communicate to customers, customers can communicate with each other and allows consumer participation in the form of feedback, discussion and debate. A short YouTube video simplified the process in four steps:
STEP 1 - Find interested people
STEP 2 - Deliver quality content
STEP 3 - Capture information
STEP 4 - Stay in touch and enables you to sell stuff!


But to what extent do companies shape discussion, surely Web 2.0 is a critical access point to reach and engage online audiences - Facebook have 800 million users at the last count! By using Facebook as an example it can influence consumer behaviour. Using my own experiences with Facebook I am often made aware of events that are happening through the use of Event Invites by my friends. My friends also post links to news or youtube videos which keep me up-to-date with things that are happening and makes me aware of whats happening as well as things they are interested in. For example my cousin sent me an invite to Cover the Night - Kony 2012 in April, but its not an event! It's just to raise awareness of a man who has spent 26 years abducting children and on 20th April they want people to wear red in protest!! I'm also guilty of asking for peoples opinions on Facebook, for example I asked my friends if they could recommend a new fitness class to me that wouldn't see me pass out 30 minutes in!!!! The response was phenomenol and I'm now booked for Cross Fit at Primal Legion. Yeah the pictures look a bit scary but I'm willing to try everything once! Now I'm also quite nosey and my friends are guilty of checking in wherever they are and shops they like or items they like and I like to follow that up and check it out! So how do Social Media sites influence this? By selling our information to advertisers? But another factor to this about is how safe our information is, do we expose ourself by revealing information in online communities such as Facebook? I read a new article in the Daily Record about a student who was writing a blog as part of her University Degree....sounds familiar! She was obviously a bit better at it that me and she attached her photo to the blog, but later discovered her picture on jumpers which were sold in Tesco!!! Now should she not be flattered that someone other than the lecturers read her blog?

Friday, 2 March 2012

WEEK SEVEN - BUSINESSES ON T'INTERNET





Today's lecture was given by Alexis which detail how the web is changing. She started off by explaining Web 1.0 which was all about accessing and reading information which has progressed into Web 2.0, collaboration using a mix of existing and emerging technologies. This has evolved due to web technologies such as WWW, HTTP, HTML and XML. Yip sounds a bit foreign - but on further reading I discovered that actually it was just different ways in which to transmit information and some of the technologies we've already covered (Wikis, Blogs, Pod casts) ...... okay maybe not that simple!


Not this Ajax!
The lecture then went on to discuss all this further, discussing Rich Internet Applications which is based on interactive web applications (maintaining features and functionality of desktop applications) and will provide the end user a more effective and responsive experience. All of which I read about on a blog! Next we discussed Ajax, not how I remembered it! Was this not a cleaner? Apparently not, its a fancy technique of web development. I amaze myself that I'm still learning!

Application Programming Interface (API) was next on the agenda and by this point I'm feeling a bit bored, hoping that this won't form part of our assessment. I'm a practical person, ask me to do and I can do - ask me to tell you how to do something and you'll get a different result. Further reading and I discovered that APIs can be used to share content and data between communities and applications, for example Twitter comments can be shared on a Business Facebook Account such as City of Glasgow College. So links back to week five - Fishfingers beans and mash - eh I mean RSS, FEEDS and MASHUPS. So I find myself asking, 'Why do we need it?' I suppose the answer is that it forms part of the Web Technology evolution, as more and more people are using gadgets such as SMART phones, tablets, iPads etc and it appears we spend more time on the Apps available for these gadgets than we do surfing the web!

Lots of content in the lecture this week as we then went on to talk about Cloud Computing which Alexis informed us that Cloud Computing together with SaaS are one of the fastest growing segments of the IT industry and allow delivered host services over the Internet. Now believe it or not I had a recent conversation with a good friend of mine who had attended an event in London to contribute ideas in the creation of a Cloud platform which would be tailor made to lettings and estate agents - London Cloud! The idea that the valuers or sales people who are perhaps losing productivity time whilst attending appointments or between appointment times could improve there productivity with the use of an iPad and Internet access is quite liberating! Having worked in this industry as Administration Manager I can see how this would benefit estate agents. Valuers had wasted journeys back to the office after every valuation just to download the images and leave the paperwork for processing. Using a Cloud could reduce costs, time and improve efficiency!

In the lecture we discussed Public (sells services to anyone on the Internet) 'V' Private (a network/data centre that supplies hosted services to a limited number of people.Categories are:
  • Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)
  • Platform as a Service (PaaS)
  • Software as a Service (SaaS)
Further research identified Hybrid Clouds where a company with a Private Cloud merges with a company who has a Public Cloud and they work together.

We then went on to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of Cloud Computing.

ADVANTAGES
  • reduces cost in the long run for hardware, software, networking equipment and administrative costs
  • reduces business risk associated with owning and managing computer technology
  • existing IT staff can focus on other areas
  • maximises business productivity with anytime, anywhere availability for users
  • built-in state-of-the-art business continuity and disaster recovery capabilities
  • financial flexibility and control over IT spending
DISADVANTAGES
  • security will be dependant on the provider
  • loss of control to the provider
  • unstable cost structure
  • potentially decreased business flexibility
  • integration problems
Can't help wondering: Is this a hype, fad or real innovation? 

Talking about innovation, there was no lab this week as Margaret wanted us to watch a documentary 'Mark Zuckerberg - Inside Facebook'. After three pages of notes I feel I learnt a lot, not only about how Facebook has progressed and succeeded where others failed (such as FreindStar, Myspace, Friends Reunited) but also how other companies have been able to grow and succeed through Facebook. Now here's a young guy, a psychology and computer science student who took an idea and ran with it and through his knowledge/ideas and contacts he has been able to change a global culture on how we communicate daily. As mentioned previously in my blog I watched 'The Social Network' movie based on Mark Zuckerberg, but really at this point I don't think it matters whether he stole someones ideas. Is Facebook not just a progression from the likes of Myspace? Surely its how Mark and his team has kept the users interested and opened the boundaries to what we as users and Facebook as an Information Technology company are capable of? Their unofficial motto of 'moving fast and break things', the fact that they all work in an open plan office to improve collaboration and the fact that they have a vending machine which dispenses new keyboards etc. Surely that's not the same as FreindStar, Myspace or Friends Reunited?

Gaming and advertising are ways of making Facebook financially successful to the tidy sum of $100 billion. Other companies are designing games, of which Facebook takes a third of the profit! Mark Zuckerberg poached Sheryl Sandberg from Google, because she had succeeded in the introduction of advertising in Google. Really? How can he be criticised? He has found a way to use his audience to his advantage as well as to the advantage of his users - a true entrepreneur? He has found a way of businesses being able to advertise and narrow their audience to offer them products and services based on the information we provide. Yeah perhaps we haven't asked for it but it can be handy if you've previously stated you like an item and then you have the opportunity to share with your friends and vice versa. As long as the 800 billion users of Facebook maintain the good faith in Mark and his team and they maintain the comfort and privacy of its individual users then how can we not ....